Love
Can Open Prison Doors
by Starr Daily
Chapter 1:
The Last Experiment
Chapter
2: Love Versus Dungeon Doors
Chapter
3: Love Versus Prison Door of Self
Chapter
4: Love Versus Prison Door of Ignorance
Chapter
5: Love Versus Prison Door of Violence
Chapter
6: Love Versus Prison Door of Death
Chapter
7: Love and The Prison Door of Disease
Chapter
8: Love Can Open Prison Doors of Steel
CHAPTER
III - Love Versus Prison Door of Self
Brave
conquerors! For so you are
Who war against your own affections
And the huge army of the world's desires,
-Shakespeare.
We
of today recognize the great English playwright's genius, but what was taken for
wisdom in his day we've found to be false in ours.
We know now that war in any form has never solved a human problem. We know that
to declare a state of war between us and our desires does not eradicate those
desires, but rather intensifies them in proportion as our war-like wills appear
victorious and strong.
When I came out of the dungeon and had again resumed my routine duties, I was in
possession of an idea that had worked a seeming miracle in my behalf. But while
I had a recognition of this idea, I did not have the sense of illumination, the
feeling of ecstasy that had been born to me as a result of it there. Too,
although I realized the idea to be a medium through which I could contact
creative power, I didn't know how to go about applying the medium to my problems
now.
These problems were many and life-long duration. They began immediately to
present themselves to me for consideration the same day I had my release from
punishment; for that day there was established in me an intense desire for a new
deal of livingness.
Therefore, I sat down one evening to list my mental, moral and physical assets
and liabilities. I discovered that I had shelter, food and clothing, such as
they were. I was able to read, write and cipher a little. Against these things
the list of my liabilities ran into interminable lengths.
The problem appeared simple under such circumstances. I would simply start from
scratch, and declare war on my physical ill health, replace my negative attitude
with a positive attitude, substitute optimism for pessimism, and presto, all
would be hunky-dory.
The thoughtful reader, however, will see that I had set a mighty big order for
myself. In fact, what I desired to accomplish meant a complete right-about-face
from all the destructive habits I had acquired and nurtured through the years.
My intention was to go to war against them and slay them in one fell blow with
the rapier of my will. My intentions were excellent; however, I hadn't reckoned
on the strength of the enemy. My effort, though heroic, was short-lived and
ended in dismal and mind-tormenting failure.
The more I tried to war against my habits, the more persistently they pressed
their claims upon me. I grew melancholy under the strain. A sense of weakness
and hopelessness took hold of me, which defied constructive thinking, which
defied thinking of any kind, except thoughts of impotence and misery.
The desire for the things I had lived became more and more intense, until reason
warned me that a compromise would have to be made, and compromise was the first
step to failure. From it the plunge back down would be swift and certain.
But the worst of all, my health instead of improving under the ordeal, took an
opposite turn. I soon learned that willpower was one thing, and that to use it
constructively against life-long habits was another.
It seemed that all the legions of hell had turned out to concentrate their fire
upon me alone. If I decided to miss a meal out of regard for my health, that
particular meal would be certain to contain seldom-served items that I
especially liked. Every time I picked up a magazine or newspaper, I would be
sure to find some brilliant, logical attack up on the virtues I had set before
me. Things occurred that I had never known to occur before to test my resolve.
For instance, I had been an inveterate user of profanity. And being profane, I
had not noticed it being used by others so much. But no sooner had I resolved to
stop its use, I began to notice that every one seemed to use it. Books that
contained it were thrust in my way. An essay by a popular author on the use of
profanity was given to me. The author argued that those who did not curse had no
strength of character. Men who couldn't say damn once in a while had lost all
claim to masculinity. They were unpardonable sissies; and he clinched his
argument with a long list of leaders in American history, including the father
of his country, who had cursed their way to fame and victory over insurmountable
odds.
Profanity
was a vigorous mode of expression that fitted perfectly into all occasions
requiring force and vigor.
I had a habit of chewing tobacco, which, for me in prison, had been an expensive
one to gratify. To obtain chewing tobacco had been a constant struggle. But now
that I had resolved to give the habit up, the weed was forced upon me from all
manner of sources without one single effort on my part to acquire it.
My strongest mental habit had been intolerance of other persons' opinions, which
had, all my life, kept me in hot water, fights and squabbles. Of course, this
habit headed my list. I determined I would look at the other fellow's viewpoint
and respect it even if I couldn't agree with it. I would refuse to argue with
anyone, taking the stand that fools argued and wise men discussed. But again
this good intention was easier resolved than carried out. It seemed that those
with whom I came in contact would be pacified with nothing short of hot words.
And the more I tried to force my resolution by sheer will-power the more easily
irritated I seemed to become.
I had always thought I possessed courage. I had no fear of physical pain. I had
been clubbed by policemen into states of insensibility. I had faced death many
times while pulling off burglaries; I would fight any man at the drop of a hat.
Then one day, after I had made my resolution to be broad and tolerant, a fellow
told me I was yellow; that I didn't know what courage was. I was on my feet in
an instant. But I steeled myself, gulped down the old impulse to do battle, and
listened while he brutally continued his accusation.
"I'll tell you what courage is," he said. "You've never known
what the word meant. Everybody in this joint knows you've always been
hard-boiled. You've preached tooth and fang sermons around here for years. Now
you've decided you were all wet and wrong. You've gone wishy-washy. All right,
if you've got courage you'll go up on the chapel platform the next day we have
open forum and tell all your old friends all about it. Preach us a sermon about
your grand and glorious reformation. That'll take the kind of courage you ain't
got."
Strangely enough I hadn't thought of that particular kind of courage before. But
now I realized that bullets and blackjacks were easier to face than the ridicule
of one's cynical fellows en masse. As I pondered on such a predicament, I could
visualize an audience of sneering faces; I could hear their cat-calls and boos ;
their hisses, and their innuendoes of turn-tail, yaller-cur, long-tailed rat,
and a hundred other savage aspersions.
I didn't have the courage to face a thing of this kind, but I forced my will to
accept the challenge. I made a prepared talk and committed it to memory. Then I
sent my name and desire to the open forum director. I lived a million years of
emotional agony between that day and the day I was billed to speak. When the day
finally came I was almost a complete invalid. As I sat on the platform trying to
pretend poise as the lines filed into the auditorium, the pit of my stomach was
churning like a ball of red-hot vacuum without a mooring. As I was being
introduced, a wave of nausea swept over me and I began to tremble from head to
feet. As I rose, I was met with a roar of ridicule; tide after tide of it broke
over me as I stood there waiting for it to subside. I felt as though I was
losing consciousness. Then came a dead hush, in which I imagined one might hear
a feather fall above the mad pumping of my heart. I started out to speak; my
lips quivered open, but not a syllable issued forth. If ever self styled hero
made an inglorious retreat that hero was me. I slunk from the auditorium amid
the wildest surge of abuse I've ever heard before or since. Right there and then
I decided to scuttle all my fine resolutions. But Providence once more came to
my rescue, this time in a wholly different manner.
I was to occupy that same platform many times after this frightful fizzle. I was
to debate my newfound philosophy of behavior with some of the most brilliant
forum minds. I was to hear cheers and applause, where I had once heard only
sneers and guffaws. But I didn't achieve these things by the war process against
my habits and weaknesses. I achieved then not by trying new habits that
transcended the old. To war against a thing is to hate that thing. To sublimate
a condition is to employ the medium of love. The one compresses the condition
into a more intensified circumference, the other expands it until it has no
circumference left.
It so happened, and how fortunate it was for me, that just after I reached this
crisis, I was transferred to a different cell! The man with whom I was to share
this latter cell was a life-termer well along in years.
His name was Dad Trueblood, but he was often referred to as The Old Stir Bug.
Ordinarily this name was applied in an uncharitable sense to those prisoners who
had attracted it through odd or queer quirks in their mental characters. But in
the case of Dad Trueblood it was untouched by the critical or opprobrious. For
this old fellow was the most beloved man who had ever done time in this
particular prison. He was loved by both prisoners and officials alike, a
combination rarely found behind stone walls.
Dad was one of those exceptional persons the most chary could trust; one of
those singular individuals who, without uttering a word, broke down the
strongest restraint in others and set them to blabbing their troubles in his ear
as naively as a child goes running with its troubles to its mother. He was one
of those occasional men who could win another's confidence without effort, and
with just as little effort keep that confidence strictly inviolable.
Had Dad wished to turn informer, he could have sent scores of his confidants to
longer prison terms, and many to the electric chair. But Dad was not an
informer, and although this prison, like all other prisons, was managed after
the stool-pigeon system, no official ever thought of offending Dad's
sensibilities by offering him special privileges in return for tainted favors.
The odd twist that gave Dad the name Stir Bug occurred because he had refused a
pardon after having served twenty-seven years. His reason for such an unheard-of
act was strange and yet wholly consistent with his character. When the warden
asked him why he preferred to remain voluntarily in prison, he said that he was
getting old; that he no longer had any friends or relatives on the outside; and
that he thought he could be of more service in prison than out.
"But don't you want your freedom?" the warden had asked incredulously.
"I'm always free,'' the old lifer had replied. "It doesn't make any
difference where you are on the face of the earth, warden. If your thoughts are
free you're free. And there's no one can imprison your thoughts but
yourself."
And so Dad Trueblood had been permitted the privilege of remaining a number
instead of going out and once more becoming a name.
When I moved my belongings into his cell he was lying on his bunk. He welcomed
me casually in a friendly manner. He knew, of course, of my reputation as a bad
actor. There were few words passed between us until we had been locked in for
the evening. Then I asked him if he dad seen my fade-away in the chapel. Yes, he
had been there that day. He thought most any one else would hade done likewise
under similar circumstances. But he asked no curious questions about it.
Finally, I related my experience in the dungeon; and of my desires after coming
out; of terrific willpower battle to overcome my old habits; of my pitiful
failure to do anything in that direction. "But after that chapel
deal," I finished, "I got wise to myself in a jiffy."
"How do you mean?" he asked in an off-hand way.
"I mean this virtue stuff is all the bunk," I said.
"Then what does that make the other stuff? The stuff you've been living
before ?"
"There are some pretty wise men who have taken the gold out of the Golden
Rule, and have made that rule look pretty small, at least on paper," I
replied evasively.
"That doesn't seem important, son, in your case," Dad said.
"You've been following another rule. The important thing is, what has it
got you? Critics and logicians deal with the trees in a forest, without ever
seeing the forest itself. That's what you should be looking at now -- not the
too logical details, not what the other fellow has done with your old
philosophy, but what you have done with it. If you're satisfied with the
results, then your rule has worked out, if not, then the sensible thing to do is
to stick to your guns and try another way."
But I've tried that and failed," I said hopelessly.
"No, you haven't," he said, "you've just gone at it wrong. For
instance, if you wanted to become a cannibal right quick, where before you'd
only been a moderate eater of meat, why just force yourself to break off with
meat by using your will and nothing else. No, son, the easiest and safest way to
rid yourself of many bad habits is to recondition yourself to one good habit.
Once you have it established, the others will have disappeared without much
strain."
What he did was to show me how to apply the idea I had discovered in solitary
confinement, or rather the idea that had been discovered for me, and turned to
my account in spite of me.
First I was to forget all about my notion of going to war with my habits. I was
just to assume that nothing had happened to me; that my attitude was the same as
it had always been; that I was not to make any attempt to force a change in my
custom of living; but that whenever and wherever I could do it without strain or
pressure, to do something constructively creative; a quiet thought, an
encouraging word to some one at the right time, a stimulating hint to another, a
constructive action, either selfish or unselfish.
I was to read, as I had always read, books that appealed to the negative side of
my life. But as I read I was to try to build in something positive between the
lines, whenever I could appear to do it without too much labor.
"Make it a game, son," he said, "and not a task. Let it be a
challenge but not a command."
Guided safely by the unerring knowledge Dad had of sublimation, I entered into
the spirit of the game and found it not only profitable but pleasurable. It was
accepted as a novelty, a plaything, something, with which to while away the
time; and the joy of which depended upon the game itself, and not upon the
results to be accomplished.
During the day at my machine I made a game of sewing garments. Each one I
finished had in it an effort to make it better than its predecessor. This part
of the game alone relieved me entirely of the burden my labor had always had for
me before. As a I continued to play it, I soon found it becoming a fascinating
habit. Time that had always dragged heavily with each begrudging stitch, now
flew by on wings of tirelessness. I won privileges on my workmanship, and many
compliments from the superintendent of the shop. But the surprising thing about
it all was that I not only made better garments, but I was able to complete my
task in much less time than when I had been fighting the sewing machine every
minute and turning out slipshod material; where I had been constantly jerking at
my cloth and breaking my thread, thus wasting time rethreading my needle, I now
worked more smoothly and consequently with little lost motion. One of my best
games was to see how many completed garments I could make without an accidental
breaking of my thread. On several occasions I finished the whole task, twelve
garments, without a mishap.
This game was taken up by those around me, and eventually spread over the entire
shop. The superintendent was amazed at the results. He made it a competitive
game and offered prizes for the winners. Not only were the garments made better;
but there was a great saving accomplished by eliminating wastage, garments too
hastily thrown together that later had to be discarded and new ones made to
replace them.
And all the while I would be working away at my task, I also played a game with
my thoughts. I would analyze them as they drifted through my mind. I would label
each as it came along. If it was destructive, I would counter with a
constructive one deliberately created for the purpose, and vice versa. As I
continued to play, I soon became conscious of a subtle, but definite drawing
away of the destructive thoughts. The constructive ones came more and more
unbidden, until finally I was aware that whole sequences of them would pass
through my mind without being broken by one negation. Too, I found it becoming
increasingly repugnant to deliberately create a destructive thought to carry out
my game of counter-action.
Then when my task had been completed, I hatched up another game. I called it the
game of constructive deeds. Each day I tried to increase the number of little
unobtrusive things I could do for my fellows. I would hold loving thoughts
toward men who had always been my avowed enemies. Many of them I had bloody
encounters with and hadn't spoken to since. Without fitting any other action to
these thoughts, I watched and waited, and in every case was rewarded by seeing
the iceberg melt that had stood between us, and it wasn't long until I had no
enemies left.
This game by itself did something psychic to me. I didn't know what it was at
the time. But it was an expanding something that drew men closer to me, even
while I drew farther away from the life or the type of livingness they stood
for. I didn't know why men distrusted the pious and self righteous sort of
comradeship and fellowship; nor exactly what the difference was between that
sort and the sort that I was expressing; but I knew there was a difference
because the results were different. What that difference was didn't seem to
matter. I was becoming more and more result-conscious, and this in itself was an
excellent sign.
And then at night in my cell I would take up a book that I had always looked
upon as my Bible. It was Schopenhauer's Studies in Pessimism. With this book I
now made another fascinating game. I went through it thought for thought,
translating it in long-hand on pieces of wrapping paper. My translation of the
title was Studies In Positiveness. For each negative thought given by the
author, I wrote down its best positive opposite.
Nor did one of the author's negations defy translation, indeed I invariably
found many positive thoughts in one of his negative ones, from which I would
choose the strongest. Sometimes it took me an entire evening to get over one
page; other times I would do as many as five pages. Only once did I ask Dad to
help me, and then he shook his wise old head.
"Solitaire is a one man game," he said, "and you're doing fine.
Keep right after it until you win on your own efforts."
That enormous bundle of manuscript was destroyed. I've often wished I had
preserved it. There was a certain sentiment attached to it, I suppose. It was
something tangible that stood for something much greater, though intangible, the
beginning of a slow but steady bulge upward. But after all, though the
manuscript was destroyed, its effect on me is still alive and will remain so
until the end of my days. The effects of constructive building are eternal:
destructive building leads to limitation and death. But of all my early games
with the implements of life, I believe this one, in its cumulative results, had
the greatest influence for good.
The
translating of this book gave me an intense interest m the positive side of
life. It led me smoothly into an examination of the Old and New Scriptures, and
of other literature that stressed the positive along with the negative in human
behavior.
However, in this prison at that time, true positive literature was a scarce
article. One day I picked up a magazine of the kind that had been nearly worn
out from much reading and had been discarded by its last reader. With great
enthusiasm, I went through it from cover to cover. When I had finished I decided
I would have a friend subscribe for it in my name and number.
The subscription was entered and I waited eagerly for my first copy. I waited
several weeks. Then I had my friend write the publisher to find out about the
delay. A reply informed me that the magazine, along with other printed matter
from the same publisher, had been coming to me regularly. A little private
investigation turned up the information that our chaplain, who was also our
literary censor, had disapproved of the reading material presented through this
publishing house.
My first impulse was to fly into a good old-fashioned fit of rebellion and write
the chaplain a vituperative note of denunciation. In fact I did talk to Dad in
no uncertain terms as to what I thought of a chaplain who would permit every
deadening and salacious book and magazine printed to come in to us, and then set
his objection on a magazine that didn't carry a single article or item not
calculated to lift the consciousness of its readers.
The old man listened patiently until I had spent myself. Then he said: "All
true, and heroically put, son. It's pleasing to unburden ourselves sometimes of
what has all the earmarks of justifiable indignation. But the trouble with it in
this case is that it only makes bad matters worse. Remember the little game
you're playing ? Well, it's a broad game. Any situation can be fitted into it.
But not with hate and criticism; that is, if you expect to win."
"But how in this case?" I asked him.
"How did you break down enmity over in the shop?" He said no more. But
his suggestion was enough.
I set about to formulate a new game around the chaplain. First I studied him and
got to the bottom of his reasons for withholding my literature. I couldn't agree
with those reasons. They seemed narrow and unreasonable to me. But I did grant
him the right to entertain them, even though they had appearance of injury to
me. I told myself that since the material printed in this magazine was in
conflict with the religious creed held by the chaplain he was actuated by that
consideration alone, and that he was honestly sincere in his belief that such
reading matter would do harm to those who read it.
As I reasoned thus, I could not help but feel sorry for a man laboring under
such rigid limitations. And this emotion, although it is not true love, is
mighty close to compassion. At any rate, I soon found myself creating genuinely
loving thoughts toward my censor. I began visualizing him as I thought the
Master might visualize him. And the more I played at the game the more I thought
of him as an EXPRESSION OF GOD and the less I thought of him as an expression of
limitation.
Besides, I found a way of doing a few little services for him without his
finding out who did them. For instance, I pointed out to my warder that three
sun-shades would greatly improve the looks of the administration building. The
warder agreed with me and said he would point the same thing out to the warden.
As a result I was permitted to make the shades as well as the pattern. I made
them as attractive as I possibly could; and they did improve the looks of that
part of the building. But the one most pleased with the innovation was the
chaplin, because it was the windows to his study they shaded against the
afternoon sun.
On another occasion I was able to acquire a red-lettered student's Bible, a
beautiful book, and have it placed on the chaplin's desk in his absence. On the
first flyleaf I had written, "With the compliments of a friend."
In the meantime I spoke no word to him. I attended his services and found him
saying things that were illuminating and admirable -- thing that I had formerly
closed my mind against with a door of indifference and prejudice. With this door
now opened the effect was exhilarating. I seemed to lose all interest in his
human faults and shortcoming, particularly as they affected me. I began to think
of him in terms of brotherly love and to feel what I thought intensely.
Then one noon day he came down the gallery and stopped in front of our cell. He
carried under his arm several magazines and pamphlets that had been sent to me.
He told me that he had seen fit to censor them because they dealt with
pantheism; [the doctrine identifying God with the various forces and workings of
nature] a dangerous doctrine. Recently, however, he had changed his mind and
decided to allow me to have books, providing I would promise not to pass them on
to others. I made no such promise; nor did he seem insistent on that point. I
thanked him, and we talked for quite some time in a real get-acquainted fashion,
and a friendship was there established between us that was active until the day
I bade him goodbye.
This demonstration, and it was a demonstration, of the power of love to use
creative principle effectively against adverse conditions, not only helped me in
this particular, but it helped scores of my fellows, because shortly after it
the chaplain lifted his ban on the literature of this publishing house and this
prison became one among many into which this house sent free reading matter to
the inmates.
Obviously, love can open prison doors-all manner of prison doors. But of all the
doors most important to open, none is more important than the door of self. Self
conquest through sublimation is the key to the fullest realm of livingness.
I do not presume to say that I had conquered myself. But I have traveled a piece
of the way, and I am moving in the right direction. Looking down the list on the
liability side of my ledger, I can see many items that have undergone a process
of transformation and now adorn the side on which I've written down my assets.
This side of my list is longer than the liability side, much longer. Many little
victories have made it so, and each one of those small victories carried with it
its own particular thrill. The game has been pleasurable and there is still much
room for play. My asset list is only partially complete. I shall probably never
complete it in my remaining lifetime, but I'll have a lot of fun playing the
game to that end.
It will be recalled that at the time my list was made I suffered from many
physical ills. These have all vanished without my being aware of the
reconditioning process. Wholesome, constructive thinking did the trick,
reflecting in my physical organism that which I held in my mind.
Since that time, and it has been several years, I've suffered very few physical
indispositions. My body converts food into energy almost instantly now. I follow
sane health rules, of course, for they are constructive and it pays to follow
them. With excellent elimination and excellent assimilation, I am no longer a
sufferer of that powerful physical enemy of man, inertia. [resistance to
change]. I can work long hours without feeling fatigue. I can induce sleep
within a moment and rest, perfectly relaxed for six hours, undisturbed by dreams
or noise. All of which is something. Or at least to me it has been worth
gaining, especially since the method used to gain it was a joy in itself.
Cheerfulness to me now is a habit I seldom feel moved to break. Those long
periods of hopelessness, indecision, worry, fear and lassitude are all over.
My greatest joy is obtained from playing my little game of deeds, of finding
something I can do for others in a helpful constructive way. And although the
joy is found in the doing, somehow these services have never failed to return
good for good, in the same coin, only with multiplied interest, in the manner
they were sent out.
As one of numerous instances of this kind, the case of Paul Harding comes easily
to my mind. Paul was one of those many thoughtful, retiring boys who are
frequently misunderstood, even by members of their own families, and who, as a
consequence of this misunderstanding, often get off on the wrong foot for a
start in life.
When I first knew Paul, I found him striving desperately to conceal his strong
emotional life behind a front of callous pretense, sophistication, indifference,
boredom. His efforts were pathetic. I saw behind these efforts the soul of a
poet. And when I had broken away his false restraints, he admitted that as long
as he could remember he had wanted to write verse. However, his early family
life had not been conducive to or sympathetic with his ambition. Instead of
constructive praise for his embryonic attempts, he had received ridicule, and
this above all other forms of discouragement, is positively murder to a
sensitive soul.
I promptly responded to his ambition and asked him to let me see some of his
poems. He hadn't written any since he had been in prison, but with the interest
I showed in his ability to do so, he produced a little poem in his cell that
night, and strangely enough it displayed nothing of his pretense or the effects
of his environment. It was a crude piece. Even I could see that. But the
potential poet was there just the same. The theme of it was Pollyannaish. I
advised him not to show it to any one else ; for I well knew how it would be
received and I also knew what such a reception would do for him. Instead, I
encouraged him and set him to work writing more of them. And that was about the
extent of my ability to help him. I knew nothing about the technique of
verse-making.
When I told Dad about my predicament he laughed. "Well, you've got your
foot in it," he said. "So you may just as well get a book on poetry
and learn to write it yourself. That's the only you can go any farther toward
helping the boy."
And that is what I did. Paul and I studied verse-making together. And by and by
we entered into a sort of competitive race. The idea was to see who would have
his first poem published. Paul beat me with a fine little poem which was printed
in his county newspaper. From then on he was a regular contributor to this
paper, and later, before he left prison, a volume of his poems was brought out.
Now here is the way I profited through this bit of service. First, it was great
fun. Second, I learned enough about it to be able to write topical verses and
humorous verses, which I sold to magazines and newspapers under all kinds of
names, and with the money acquired in this way, I was able to employ a lawyer
for a friend who was innocent of the charge against him, a fact which was fully
and completely established when his lawyer obtained a new trial for him.
This money was later returned by my friend with an additional sum and was
promptly used over again towards the purchase of a community radio, the first
one to be put into this prison for our sole benefit. And what a boon it was!
Especially during the baseball season when we could get the returns of our
favorite team play by play, instead of having to wait until the next day to read
it all through stale news accounts.
I have said nothing about the real value of this poetry game as that value
affected the life of Paul Harding. Need I say more than this: he gave up crime
for poetry; he has prospered and so has society.
CHAPTER
IV - LOVE
VERSUS PRISON DOOR OF IGNORANCE
A
boy is better unborn than untaught.
-Gascoigne.
There
is one curse to which nearly all prisoners are subject, incomplete education or
no education at all.
It seems almost inconceivable that only a few years ago a great institution such
as the one in which I was incarcerated could have been without educational
facilities for its wards. But such was the condition. Not only was it a
condition, but it was a condition enforced by prison law. You were allowed to
read such books as the library afforded; but to be discovered with a pencil or
writing paper in your possession was equivalent to many days in solitary on
bread and water.
One of the reasons institutional education was discouraged in this prison was
because of an inferiority complex on the part of its officials. Under the
prevailing wage scale for officials at that time, only a brutal and ignorant
type of man could be induced to take these jobs; and these men found a mutual
interest in ignorant prisoners ; but in prisoners superior to them in education,
they found a deep and abiding resentment. They were bitterly opposed to all
forms of learning for prisoners that, by contrast, would tend to emphasize their
own lack of learning. If a prisoner had been fortunate enough to have had the
advantages of an education, he soon discovered after entering the prison that he
was in for hell, unless he was shrewd enough at the outset to conceal his
educational assets by assuming a pose of ignorance. This was very often resorted
to by educated prisoners.
Today this same prison has one of the finest educational systems in operation
that has ever been established in any prison. (or it did have when I left there
a few years ago). This school was functioning in conjunction with many big
correspondence schools throughout the country. After the grades had been passed,
the prison scholar could then avail himself of correspondence school training,
which embraced everything in the way of vocation, and profession, from the arts
and languages to business and the trades. Training was made compulsory up to the
fourth grade; beyond that it was optional with the prisoner. It was a sight for
earnest eyes to go into the big school room and see old men sitting side by side
with youngsters mastering their A B Cs. And in another section of the room, to
see eager hands trying to gain speed and efficiency on the typewriter; and in
still other sections, to see competent inmate teachers patiently but effectively
instructing their classes in all manner of specialities.
I do not say that this school is the finished result of any of my own efforts;
but I can and do say proudly that because I had learned about the power of love
to contact creative principle I was privileged to furnish the incentive or the
nucleus around which the idea speedily grew.
Imagine if you can, an institution that for almost a hundred years had been
managed on a system that exalted ignorance and low-rated knowledge. You would
say that such a habit of management, ingrained by a century of unrelieved custom
could hardly be uprooted in the course of a few months. That nevertheless, is
exactly what occurred.
Moreover, a college professor, a man of tremendous ability, was appointed to
organize and superintend the difficult undertaking. He not only established the
school, but he convinced those in power that a new school library was a
necessary adjunct to a school of this kind, and thus for the first time in the
prison's history the inmates could secure books of real educational value.
Of course, the idea first met with strong opposition both political and
non-political. It required considerable money to promote and realize an
educational institution so broad in scope as this one. There were those who
argued that education, instead of tending to correct criminals, would tend only
to make of them a greater menace to society. A slow-witted criminal had little
chance against the well organized forces of the law; but a criminal whose brain
had been stimulated and developed through the process of education would be
vastly more competent in the commission of crime. His imaginative faculties
would become broader and more original; where he had once been dull, he would
become clever; his ability to look ahead would be greatly enhanced, and thus he
would be able to plan his crimes more efficaciously, eliminating the weak spots
in his programme of attack; where he had once blundered into his crimes blindly,
without considering the most important feature in crime commission, the
get-away, he would now be able to reason backward from a well-planned get-away
to the crime's commission, a process of thought beyond the capacity of an
ignorant criminal, but wholly within the powers of one whose mind had been
trained in the difficult art of coherent, analytical thinking.
Students of penology watched the prison school system with much interest and
speculation. Most of them were in accord with the movement. Most of them
believed that the surest way to convince a man that crime was a losing game in
the long run was to educate him to the point where he could see and understand
this maxim for himself; and that the best way to create a potential good citizen
out of a potential bad one, was first to arouse within him an intelligent self
interest, and then place before him the means to cultivate that interest along
constructive lines that entailed a knowledge of good citizenship and a desire to
become a good citizen if for no other reason than the one based upon self
preservation, that it paid to conform to existing social standards, even though
to do so might often prove tedious and unprofitable.
Whether or not this controversy was ever settled I do not know. But this I do
know, in my experience I observed more than a hundred confirmed criminals who,
because of this prison educational system, left prison to fill honest
occupations that had before been beyond their reach. Nor did I observe one among
them who returned to prison for committing another crime.
It
is my honest belief that if it is possible to reform a person of anti-social
tendencies, there is no surer method to that end in existence than to turn
constructively such a person, through education, away from the old tendencies by
giving him new and more appealing ones to follow. There is a sense of ought in
the most hardened criminal. Ought I to pull this job, or oughtn't I ? These are
the preliminary questions to every crime committed. And constructive education
gives the constructive answer to them more influence over the individual by
making that answer more reasonable and consequently more appealing. I believe
penology's strongest weapon is education.
In this prison I was the first man ever to be permitted the unheard-of privilege
of taking a correspondence course of study. At the time I had no idea how
far-reaching the results of this privilege would be. And the warden, who granted
me the privilege, of course established a precedent in doing so, and thus
unwittingly let the bars down for an avalanche of similar requests, which he
could not refuse, and which absolutely snowed him under.
He was bewildered when he called me into his office. "I've made a mistake
in letting you have that course," he said. And then he pointed to a
ten-inch stack of requests. "They're all the same. Fellows wanting to order
courses. We have no mailing facilities here for handling so much of this type of
stuff. I'm afraid I've got my foot in it. I didn't know there was such a craze
in the world for education. God only knows how I'll ever get out of it."
I knew, of course, that one of his ideas for getting out was to backtrack on the
original privilege granted me. I had to think fast in order to forestall this
action. So I said:
"Warden, here's your chance to contribute a real service to society. It'll
never pass your way again. If you seize the opportunity now, your name will go
down as one of the outstanding prison executives of the world; but if you let
the opportunity slip you'll pass out with the next change of administration,
just another prison warden who served his time and drew his pay as wardens have
done before him. Why don't you put in a school ? Get a good man in charge of it
and let him handle it in his own way. In that manner the problem will solve
itself so far as you're concerned."
"By Jove!" he exclaimed. "That's an idea. I anticipate a fight.
But I'm ready to go to the bat."
And with that vigorous statement a hastily formulated dream of mine had its
first push forward toward fruition.
When I first thought of asking the warden for the privilege of taking a course
of study, I was fully aware that such a request, under ordinary circumstances,
would he briefly received and flatly rejected. Dad Trueblood and I talked the
matter over, and as always, Dad had only one method for attacking all problems
-- the method of contacting creative principle through the intermediary of love.
"But how am I going to reach the warden ? How am I going to make my love
known to him?"
"Love," he said, "needs no advance agent. When it's purely
conceived and powerfully felt, it will find its objective. It does not follow
you: you follow it. First you love, and then you act."
"You mean I can prepare the warden in advance so that he will receive my
request with favor?"
"Not you. But love expressing through you will prepare him."
"Without any effort on my part?"
"None but love. In fact, you need not go about him at all. Say, that's an
inspiration. Instead of you making the request of the warden, let your friend on
the outside do it, by mail."
Contrary to general opinion, it isn't so difficult to evoke a feeling of love
even for one's jailer. You can reason yourself into this emotion. That is what I
did in this case. And it worked out perfectly.
After all, I said to myself, prisons were a necessary evil in a civilization
that harbored the type of preying animal I had been. And if prisons were
necessary, so were wardens to manage them. This warden was merely filling an
inevitable duty, and if it wasn't him then it would be someone else. Despite the
disagreeable position he held, he was a man for all that, with the same
God-given spark that I possessed, the same potentialities for good and evil. We
were brothers under the skin. We were both headed in the same direction,
although our paths had not always run parallel. He had his troubles the same as
I. His faults were no worse than mine. In a word, he, as every mortal born to
struggle up through trial and error, was more entitled to love and understanding
than to censure. Who was I to sit in judgment? Had not the Master of men said,
"Woman where are thine accusers?" And refused to judge her Himself
when He noted all had slunk away.
In this manner of reasoning one unavoidably comes to the place where censorship
ends, and where censorship ends true love begins. [Judgement centered in Love is
for correction (probation) not damnation - God's fire is the purging process of
bring forth perfection].
It took me only a very short while to arouse within me a deep responsive feeling
of love for the warden, and it grew and grew as I continued to search his inner
being for the Christ-like traits that were the heritage of every human being.
Finally I began to visualize him in all manner of constructive, humanitarian
activities. I saw him courageously doing the right thing, although he well knew
that the right thing was not the popular thing for him to do. I saw him with my
request in his hand; I sympathized with him when he passed through a wavering
period of indecision; I bowed in inward gratitude when his eyes took on the
light of victory over self and indecision fell away from him as he determined to
do the constructive thing and allow me to have my course of study.
In the meantime I had written to my friend explaining my desire and asking her
to inform me of the exact hour and date her letter to the warden was to go
forward. In this manner I was able to arrive at the date and hour the letter
would reach the warden's desk. Through another source I found out the exact time
the warden sat down to examine his mail. And thus at this time I visualized him
with my friend's letter in his hand. As I watched him reading it, I let my love
close in around him until he seemed to be completely enveloped in it to the
exclusion of every other vibratory influence. [Daily evokes a scripture, not
from the reading, but from the Spirit; calleth those which be not as though they
were - Romans 4:17].
I would not say this was scientific procedure. Some of you may even laugh it off
as being the antics of a simpleton. I wouldn't presume to state that such an
effort on my part had anything to do with the warden's decision. But I do say
that his decision was made precisely as I wanted him to make it.
Through
this course of study I was able to prepare myself for an honest, constructive
future. I left prison at a time when the depression had just reached its peak,
when competition in the labor market was as great as it ever has become. It
might be that without this preparatory work I could have gone out in the world
and competed successfully with skilled and unskilled millions. It might be that
my prison and criminal record, all that I possessed in the way of reference,
would have offered no handicap to me in my effort to secure a place in the world
of honest endeavor.
But in the event the situation had not panned out in this manner, which would
have been at least quite possible -- what then?
Maud Ballington Booth once wrote a book under the title After Prison, What ? A
man may go out of prison with the very best of intentions, but if he is
unprepared, if he is worse off than when he entered prison, his intentions are
likely to meet with opposition too strong to be endured. Nothing will so take
the starch from an ex-prisoner's stiff resolutions like rebuff and indifference.
As soon as he becomes thoroughly convinced that he is not wanted, the step
between that point and his old life becomes a mighty easy one to take.
I remember a resolution I once made of the kind as I was leaving prison after
serving my first term. I had been given a parole. The town I went to on parole
had a shoe factory in it, and by telling a few skillful lies I managed to get a
job in this factory. It was a good job, too. It paid excellent wages on a piece
work basis. And the novelty of earning an honest living had a certain appeal
about it, which I responded to with considerable satisfaction.
In the evening after a good bath and hearty supper I would stretch out an my bed
and declare to myself, "By golly, this is not so bad." There was a
definite lift to this business of achieving a laudable day's work; a decided
sense of security about it that was wholly new and tremendously gratifying. If
the thing hadn't happened that did happen shortly afterwards, I might have, then
and there, reconditioned myself to honest habits of a lasting nature.
But one noon-day, as I hurried up the street from the factor on my way to a
restaurant, someone hailed me from across the street, using a name of mine that
sent a tremor of fear through me. No one in this town knew me by that name, or
so I thought. Turning I saw a detective coming across the street to greet me. It
had been he who had arrested me for the crime I had just finished a prison term
to expiate. His face was aglow with a broad smile. His hand was extended in
friendship.
"Glad to see you out," he exclaimed. "When did it happen? What
are you doing?"
I explained I had been out several weeks; that I w as on probation, that I was
working down at the shoe factory.
"Fine," he said. "I for one am with you one hundred percent. I
want to see you make good. Listen, just lay off the pool halls and other joints
around here, and you'll pull the grade. I'm here now. I'm with the railroad.
Dammit, if the sledding gets tough, come out to my house. We'll make you
acquainted with the right sort of people. There's no need for you to get
lonesome."
I was amazed at the man's attitude. I wondered if I had previously misjudged
him. I returned to the factor feeling a little relieved but shaky in the region
of my solar plexus. I had been at work about an hour when I was notified the
superintendent wished to see me in his office. I felt the old sardonic sneer
welling up in me. I remember saying to the floor boss who conveyed the message
to me, "Well, I guess this is the end of a perfect day. A minute later, I
was asked if I had ever served time in prison. Of course, I well knew who had
informed on me. The detective had gone straight from his Judas kiss to the
superintendent and advised him that an ex-convict was in his employ.
I admitted the fact with a sarcastic barb at the whole world. The superintendent
was sorry that the rules of the company forbade, and so forth.
"You needn't be, " I told him. "I'm out of place here anyway. I'm
glad I got by long enough to buy a good gun. That's my racket. It's all I know.
Give me my check and I'll be out on my way in a jiffy."
I walked away from that job with a poisoned heart and a bitter resolution eating
into my brain like a cancer. It took some time to dull the edge of that mood. In
the meantime I did some reckless things against the social order before I
finally stopped with another prison sentence.
I
have said elsewhere that reformation to be effective and permanent must be
accomplished by transcending old habits; by reconditioning one's self to new
habits of thought and behavior.
To this end the average prisoner will neither respond to reason nor persuasion,
harsh treatment nor kind. But, quite to the contrary, he will readily respond to
an educational program with an inspirational tone to it, the quality that
arouses self interest, and offers a positive means to a broader mode of living
for him. When such a program fails, the man is hopeless so far as human
influence is concerned. Nothing save an act of Providence can swerve him from
his downward path.
As an illustration of what education can accomplish where all other methods have
failed, I wish to recount, briefly, the cases of two men, not because I was
privileged to play a minor part in their salvation, but more to show that even
the worst of human timber can be salvaged from the gulf of destruction and
rendered useful to society when the educational method has been made available
to them.
Spider Ross was young in years, but old in experience. He was one of those
borderline cases the criminologists like to study. That he was criminally insane
the doctors had no doubt. But always convictions for crime and sentences in
Spider's many mishaps sent him to prison instead of the criminal insane asylum.
Spider was one of those shifty-eyed, loose-lipped, pasty-faced crooks of the
petty variety. A kleptomaniac, I believe they call them in professional
terminology. He could neither read nor write his own name. He walked with the
swaggering defiance of ignorance, and so far as any one could judge from mere
observation, he possessed nothing but a surface, and a shallow surface at that.
Apparently his only ambition was to live his own life and be allowed to brag
about it as he liked.
When the prison school was established, Spider of course became what they called
a "list man," that is, his name was on the list of those to whom
training was made compulsory. I worked beside Spider, and when he heard they
were going to force him to attend school, he promptly revolted. "I'll
go," he told me, "but they can't make me learn anything."
It didn't take me long to realize that the school could be of little service to
Spider so long as he held this attitude. I took his problem to the school
superintendent and asked him to allow me to handle Spider's case. He agreed to
my request, and I thereupon removed Spider's name from the list. When the
list-bearers made the round to notify the others the day school was to start,
Spider was passed up. Though he said nothing, it was plain he had taken the
event as a slight and was very much disappointed. He wanted to tell the
list-bearer a mouthful, as he put it.
The school was a roaring success from the start. In the shop there was no other
topic of conversation. Enthusiasm ran riot. Spelling matches were begun;
arithmetic problems were pondered over and solved. Every one had a stack of
school-books he carried back and forth. The more literate prisoners turned from
topics of crime to topics of history, government, economics, and so on. World's
Almanacs were borrowed from the new library with which to settle disputes.
Spider found himself completely disassociated from his fellows. Everywhere he
went the conversation had to do with school subjects. After the tasks were all
in, the prisoners would form groups, each on its own intellectual level, and get
off in a private place to discuss their next day's assignments. If Spider
approached one of these groups he would remain only a moment, because he had no
mutual interest there. It was practically a case of unintentional ostracism.
Spider was in the position where "a feller needs a friend." And his
extremity proved my opportunity. When he could talk to no one else, I talked to
him as we worked. I talked to him about the thrill one got from trying to learn
things. Slowly but surely, his interest rose. Then one day he asked me why they
had left his name off the school list. I replied by suggesting that he must have
requested it. He was vigorous in his denial of this.
"Well, I guess they figured you weren't interested in school," I
countered.
"I don't see why," he said, "I didn't say so."
"But maybe they figured you thought so. Actions speak louder than words
sometimes, you know."
He wondered if it was too late to get in. I thought I could arrange it for him.
But he would have to study hard in order to catch up with the rest.
And so Spider Ross the next day found himself for the first time in his life on
the inside of a class room. No doubt he was an exception, but once he was
started and had mastered the first difficult steps, after he had learned to read
a little, his thirst for more knowledge became an exaggerated mania, the talk of
the prison. In two school terms he absorbed what was equivalent to an eighth
grade education. Every one was amazed at his capacity to assimilate complicated
subjects. He was never without a book within his reach. As he operated his
machine the book stood propped open before him.
At the beginning of this third school term, he took up business, shorthand and
typing in conjunction with a correspondence course in salesmanship. At the close
of the term he was placed in one of the most difficult steno graphical positions
in the prison where question and answer dictation had to be taken with the speed
of a court reporter. While holding down this job, he found time to continue his
studies, to invent a dozen or so different kinds of gadgets, which he planned to
copyright later, and to write two excellent books on salesmanship, one under the
title The Psychology of Depression and the other, Depression Salesmanship.
Spider left prison in the midst of the depression. His methods for making
personal capital out of national hard times were all set forth practicality and
convincingly in his books. That he demonstrated his theories, I haven't the
slightest doubt in the world, although I heard nothing more of him after he had
taken his departure.
I reiterate, his was doubtless an exceptional case. When a man can start from
the lowest level of ignorance and criminal insanity, and in three years' time
win a place of position of trust within his prison, and prepare himself as he
did for a position of trust outside his prison, such an achievement is not only
exceptional, it is phenomenal.
The important thing is, however, that he did it. The important thing to society.
Institutional education had taken an obvious social menace in Spider Ross and
transformed him into a social servant. Thus I have found it: education lifts the
consciousness of the prisoner it touches, instead of contributing to the
furtherance of his criminal tendencies.
And again we see in Spider's case, how first there was developed an intense
thirst or love for knowledge, which set the creative principle to building in an
opposite direction. Before his love medium had been for destructive things and
such things had been created through him. With the love medium reversed, the
creative principle could do nothing else but create in the new direction. As the
love medium tends the creative law inclines.
The
case of Harry Simmons was quite different from that of Spider Ross in one way,
but the result was similar in that through the prison school both had been able
to find themselves and their particular niches in life.
Harry had attended college, was an excellent scholar and possessed a high
standard of taste toward the cultural things. He could discuss academics with a
glib and perfect accent. He was typically a young intellectual, a trifle
egotistical, somewhat snobbish, and vastly intolerant toward those whose frontal
bones failed to measure up to the lofty dimensions of his own.
At some point in his educational career he had come under the influence of a
certain German philosopher. This philosopher propounded a super-man doctrine
which, in the hands of a person more impressionable than stable, held a
dangerous interpretation, an interpretation altogether ruthless and inhuman.
Indeed, it was Harry Simmons' misinterpretation of a brainy man's philosophical
doctrines that paved the way for his pride to prison.
"Live hard and dangerously," was the credo this philosopher laid down
for the guidance of the super-man. Meaning, of course, that it was the duty of
the super-man to dare the faggots of ignorance by living and teaching in advance
of his time. Poor Harry thought the philosopher meant that the super-man, being
so brilliant as to appreciate the shortness of mortal life, should crowd into it
as much vice and merry-making as he possibly could.
So he became a hard and dangerous liver. He naturally found such living
expensive. At first he gambled for the wherewithal; and later he tried forgery.
After his parents had bankrupted themselves trying to keep him out of prison
over a period of several years, they were finally obliged to stand aside and see
their prodigal take it on the chin for a five years' stretch.
Harry had what they called a political job in our shop. He wore a white shirt
instead of the regulation hickory. He was a garment checker and shipping clerk.
He was not liked because of his highbrow attitude and he was difficult to reach
because of the thick veneer of know-it-all-ness he had drawn about him.
At any rate, I decided that Harry had too good a start in life to let himself
drift down the purple tide and wind up in his old age a doddering prison lag,
sitting around in the idle house of his final prison home spinning yarns about
his many exploits, and comparing the conditions in this prison to the conditions
in that one. But while I made up my mind to attack him with the weapon of love,
I decided at the same time to use argument, since he loved to argue above any
other pastime.
I crossed verbal swords with him one day with an introductory remark that set
his blood boiling.
"Say," I said, most unexpectedly to him, "what do they teach guys
like you in college ?"
"To mind their own business for one thing," he shot back.
"Oh, I thought they taught them to write checks on the old folks' bank
account."
"Is that so! Well, get an earful of this. They also teach them how to use
their fists, if you happen to think you're lucky."
"I don't resort to violence," I said with a broad grin on my face. He
promptly thawed out, and we were soon talking about his favorite topic, the
philosophy of the super-man. We argued off and on for several days before he was
willing to accede to my constantly reiterated point that any philosophy was a
failure, unless the person embracing it could show that it had done him good
instead of harm.
After drawing this admission from him, I pointed out that the same thing could
be said of a college education; that although college men had a great advantage
over non-college men, the latter by making opportunity out of the little they
had, often succeeded in life, while the college man who refused to see the
opportunity in the much possessed, failed in the practical business of life,
that of growing and getting ahead.
These discussions, carried on at odd times daily, created a mutual bond between
us, a thing that I had been working for, because I wanted to touch upon a most
delicate subject later on, one that only friendship could take without
resentment. I wanted to show him and make him realize what he had done to his
parents, especially his mother, by dragging down the many excellent
opportunities they had made possible for him.
He told me later that I was the only person on earth who could have brought
these things home to him without giving offence. He was glad I had done it.
Also, for the first time, our discussions made him conscious of the fact that,
instead of copying his favorite philosopher's virtues, he had been twisting
those virtues into vices and copying them.
As you probably have already divined, Harry Simmons had scoffed at the idea of a
prison school for convicts. He had said that ninety per cent of the guys in this
prison were too dumb to learn anything if they were kept in school a million
years. He had evinced a great pity for the poor boobs who would have to act as
teachers. He had also said that was one job he would not do under any inducement
or pressure. He preferred the dungeon to such a job.
But Harry Simmons did become a teacher in the prison school. He sought the job,
and he filled it in an exemplary manner. He had a Spanish and English class that
positively worshiped him. He became the professor's most valuable assistant and
he, more than any one else, was responsible for some of the finest features that
the school possessed. In a word, he became a prison school enthusiast, and
served the cause early and late to make it an outstanding success, and in this
way squelch the criticism that still rumbled ominously here and there.
On commencement days, held in the big auditorium, with many noted educators from
various places present to study the effects of the system, it was Harry's
privilege to make the address which outlined the accomplishments of that
semester and voiced the hopes of the one immediately to follow, for this school
had only a very short holiday period.
How different was the philosophy this boy propounded in these addresses to that
which he had brought with him to prison! He was like a new creature. As he would
warm with enthusiasm, he was like a man who had caught a powerful vision, and
was eager to convey the inspiration of it to those who were still floundering
about in search of themselves, as he had been.
Harry was not a pupil in this prison school seeking an education, but he got
about as much out of it as any pupil there. It was not education he obtained,
but re-education.
Harry was still there when I pulled out. But he's gone by this time, and I would
be willing to wager a goodly fortune that he'll never go back to that prison or
any other.
One of the best debates the forum ever promoted was between Harry and an equally
brilliant fellow on the philosopher Nietzsche. As I sat and listened I glowed
inwardly with gratitude when the youngster revealed to me he had at last gotten
close to the real Nietzsche and had reasoned away the shadow he had been
following of that greatest of all original thinkers.
-
Now
to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to make you stand in
the presence of His glory blameless with great joy, to the only God our
Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion and
authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen. Jude
1:24-25

Webservant
for TwoListeners.org
a
non-profit project for the edification of Christians worldwide
|